Whether you enjoy the latest offering of Roland Emmerich (Independence Day, 1996) depends very much on how you liked your sci-fi served up. If you require your characters to wear long robes, spout cod philosophy, use superpowers and exist in empires with deposed heirs and family conflict, and whose story cannot be told in one sitting, this may not be for you. Emmerich protagonists tend to be ordinary people, albeit of the planet-saving variety if push comes to shove, and in this case not only does he prioritize diversity but the two most courageous are the wrong shape for heroes.
Where his previous films have enjoyed a longer build-up before catastrophe or invasion, here we are almost straight into the action. The moon is out of orbit, the government wants to hush it up against the advice of senior scientist Jo Fowler (Halle Berry), but conspiracy theory geek K.C. Houseman (John Bradley) activates social media to send the world into panic. Into the mix comes disgraced astronaut Brian Harper (Patrick Wilson) and it falls to these three not to just save the world, but first save the moon in order to prevent Earth’s destruction. They are certainly not quick enough off the mark to stop tidal waves swamping Manhattan, a bombardment of moon debris, and assorted earthquakes and tectonic activity, and in a piece of sfx bravura a gigantic gravity wave.

The trio leave behind loved ones, who are basically left to their own devices to combat the onslaught of destruction. And that is in stark contrast to officials in high office who abandon their positions in order to head for the hills (literally). In one spicy exchange two generals who hold the keys to a nuclear weapon are divided over who to save. In the various sub-plots which all coalesce, the theme is character transition.
The trailer doesn’t give away the movie’s big secret and I’m not about to either but it’s a whopper as Emmerich tracks back to favored ruminations about Earth’s origins. You can chuck away Genesis and the Big Bang as he settles on a different explanation. There are nods to Ridley Scott and even Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, but in the end Emmerich ploughs his own path of originality. The second half is amazing and really lifts the picture.
One of the problems of science fiction movies is that virtually every one falls apart under micro examination. They are filled with plot holes and make up for lack of genuine characterization by having heroes plagued by preposterous villains and back stories that lack any sense. But who the hell cares?

Emmerich films tend to take a hammering because the hero is a close relative of Tom Hanks, the dependable guy whose life has gone a little awry but wants to make amends. Here, both Brian and Jo have family issues and make wrong decisions, both, in effect, abandoning their children for the greater good, and while that might seem to set up a series of sub plots it’s no different to any superhero picture where a beloved relative is put in harm’s way because said superhero unleashes devastation in order to rein in the villain.
Emmerich could easily have anchored this with younger talent. Will Smith was in his late 20s when he starred in Independence Day. But going for older actors allows Emmerich more leeway with the family issues he brings to the fore. Nor do his disaster movies tend to top-bill a female star. That changes here with Oscar-winning Halle Berry (Bruised, 2020), who hasn’t had a hit in years, receiving a well-deserved career boost for a thoughtful role. Patrick Wilson, usually relegated to horror, also steps up.
John Bradley (Game of Thrones) is the wide-eyed geek who sees disaster as another name for adventure and as far removed from the clever-clogs Jeff Goldblum of Independence Day as you can get. Michael Pena (Fantasy Island, 2020) is the pick of the supporting roles. Donald Sutherland (The Hunger Games) has a cameo. Younger players worth a mention are Charlie Plummer (All the Money in the World, 2017) and Wenwen Yu (Forever Passion, 2021) and
Admittedly, the dialogue is cheesy in places, occasionally overburdened with scientific gibberish, but that’s par for the course.
A good old-fashioned fun ride.
It seems to be fun indeed. I’m quite fascinated by Emmerich destructive obsession. Here is a new exemple of that. Need to see it on screen now, cause you’re review shows me the way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Am perplexed by this Hollywood need to destroy every temple of society. You would have thought they’d pass a law saying “anything but the White House” or other sacred symbols of American society.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They blew out the Capitol in ID4. And Emmerich did “White house down” 😉
LikeLike
I know. Hollywood didn’t used to destroy the world – maybe a couple of streets in a car chase or a shoot out but not major buildings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is one exception by the way, “when worlds collide” in 51. An exemple of total destruction with hope for an Eden outside. Very interesting movie I’m sure you know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I suppose we could blame the aliens for inducing Hollywood to imagine they would be so destructive. Someone must have the inside track on alien attitude. WWW is a rare exception.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello Brian,
You were right about the funny side of the “Moonfall”, film that I can consider as Emmerich most amazing destructive achievement. But there’s a dark side on this masterwork, where the wind of conspiracy blows. That’s a real problem for me.
LikeLike
He was always keen on conspiracy and I always feel that sci fi has that element almost buried in its genes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As most movies these days…I will wait for VOD.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I still prefer the cinema experience. Hope you enjoy it on VOD.
LikeLike
I certainly had a good laugh watching this. Fuzz Aldrin saves the day! Lots of bang for your buck, but afterards, a grille full of melted cheese to clean…
LikeLiked by 2 people
At least the world isn’t saved by a man/woman in a suit.
LikeLike
Personally, from what I saw in the trailers this film looked like one of those disaster/monster movies from the 90s, ones you don’t watch for the plot, but you watch for the spectacle. Also, not to spoil anything, but this film was pretty much spoiled for me in the trailers as they seemed to tell a lot of the film’s plot
LikeLiked by 2 people
Trailers gave away too much for sure but that seems the way these days. Yes, a throwback to disaster movies and he could take some lessons from Spielberg is using tension but great fun if you’re not expecting much else. The plot though doesn’t go the way you would expect.
LikeLiked by 1 person