Wild raucous’n’roll rollercoaster that, contrary to expectation, I found totally absorbing, length not an issue. Employing a simple structure of rise and fall, and exploring the upside and downside of Hollywood in the transition from silent to sound, it seemed to me in essence to capture movie-making. A Broadway play could be a hit if seen by 100,000 people, that size of audience constituting a flop for a movie, but the play was viewed by 100,000 of the “right” people, the moneyed elite who could afford the tickets, a movie by the flotsam and jetsam that made up the majority of the American population even when, theoretically, the country was going through the boom times of the “Jazz Age.”
Most films and books concentrate on the downside, the battle to get to the top, the seamy undercurrent, the inevitable collapse, but none capture the giddy heights like this. Silent movies were viewed primarily as technical, nobody had to even talk, much less learn lines or spout Shakespeare. Initially, the stars were drawn from vaudeville so had some proven talent but then it was clear anyone could become a star, such as here Nellie LaRoy (Margot Robbie), or a producer like Manny Torres (Diego Calva) by simply being in the right place at the right time, initiating a gold rush to Los Angeles.

Just as there is no single reason for the camera and audience to turn a person into a star, the same applies when they fall out of favor. In a movie thankfully given little to long lectures on filmmaking beyond aspirations to “form” and wanting to do something good, the best explanation about how/why careers end is delivered in dry tones by columnist Elinor St John (Jean Smart) to disillusioned out-of-favor Jack Conrad (Brad Pitt).
The narrative shuttles between Conrad, LaRoy and Torres, interweaving the lives of trumpet player Sidney Palmer (Jovan Adepo), Conrad’s multiple wives, LaRoy’s hapless father (Eric Roberts), director Ruth Adler (Olivia Hamilton) studio wunderkind Irving Thalberg (Max Minghella), publishing magnate William Randolph Hearst (Pat Skipper), gangster James McKay (Tobey Maguire) and imperious director Otto (Spike Jonze). Excess is the name of the game whether ostentatious consumption Hollywood-style or the more sedate black tie dinners of caviar and lobster enjoyed by the elite.
The elite looked down their noses on a new class of wealthy individuals who were ill-educated, didn’t talk proper, but had struck gold simply from being able to stand in front of a camera without being able to tell their Ibsen from their Shakespeare and didn’t understand art.
Surprisingly, this is a pretty good comedy, slapstick sometimes but excelling at setting up visual jokes, though audiences might recoil from a rare reliance on elephant ordure and vomit. Some scenes are pure standout: Nellie’s first talk scene where the sound engineer has tyrannical control; Nellie’s fight with the snake; Manny’s race to find a camera before the director loses the light; the uncontrolled venom of battle scenes; the black Sidney not black enough; and of course the various wild parties although nothing in the Hollywood imagination could match the depravity of one where Manny is the unwilling guest of gangster McKay, as if fiction cannot match reality.

Of course, people who have everything rarely know what they actually want and spend their lives throwing away what they have in pursuit of the unattainable, so Conrad is apt to view wives as disposable, Nellie finds relief in drugs and gambling, Manny’s obsession with Nellie which should lead to ruin paradoxically by happenstance brings him happiness. The rampant unchecked hedonism that runs through the picture could well just be a metaphor for the helter-skelter modus operandi of the movies, enjoy it while you’re hot, cram in as much as you can, because, heaven knows, something from left field (sound, for example) could dramatically upend everything.
Brad Pitt (Bullet Train, 2022) is very good as the often drunk but generally streetwise star. You can hardly take your eyes off Margot Robbie (Amsterdam, 2022), not just for her brazen sexuality, but her ability to cry on cue, awareness of her self-destructive personality, inherited from self-destructive parents, greedy idiotic father, mother committed to an upmarket mental institution. Diego Calva (Beautiful Losers, 2021) is good in a less showy part. Interesting cameos abound.
This has the intensity of Damien Chazelle’s Whiplash (2014) rather than the cleverness of La La Land (2016).
I mentioned in my review of Tar that it could have done with a stronger producer to cut down on the running times and some elements I felt were bound to alienate audiences. I would make the same suggestion here, though not so forcefully. Elephant shit and urination are always, I reckon, going to be a major turn-off for audiences. While I had no trouble with the length, that’s clearly been an issue and it would hardly be a problem for a decent editor to snip chunks out of party scenes or eliminate non-essential characters.
Emotionally and artistically this seems to me to capture the essence of the formative days of Hollywood before the double whammy of the Great Depression and the Hays Code brought about a systematic rethink with studios insisting their stars take more care hiding their proclivities from general view.
Ignore the reviews and check it out.
We definitely came away with different takeaways. I thought there was a lot of really good stuff happening early on in this film, and a lot of hope was built up within me for a truly epic movie. But sadly, that wasn’t realized for me in the second half. If the movie had ended at the mid-point, I would have been more than happy to recommend it. Just got too talky, tedious…and I found the last couple of montage minutes so bad I couldn’t believe the studio left them in. No quarrel with the acting. I thought they did the best they could with what they were given.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I agree with you the fake money notion was a bit nonsensical and Maguire’s gangster way over the top and Tarantinoesque in wanting applause for is great ideas for movies. But if the film was about transiition to sound it was gouing to end awkwardly, very very few survived and they all found life different after. I felt the movie still had the energy to sustain the last part. I’ll probably go back and see if my judgement stands up.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Excellent comparison to Whiplashes energy and intensity! Perceptive critique and some sneak peaks. bravo!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks. I’m one of the few people to wjholeheartedly enjoy it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Moi aussi!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Glad to find someone who did.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well, you just found someone who didn’t! Did you lose the rose coloured glasses before you went into Tar?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Must have put them down somewhere. Half blind without them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a nice review you made, but you know about my opposite feeling. The snake scene for instance, is for me absolutely pointless. But that’s when Conrad understand he’s sailing in total madness and just for that suspended moment, understanding he’s at the end of the road, I think the film is relevant. Sadly, the following is not conclusive (exception : the speach of Elinor of course).
LikeLiked by 2 people
The snake scene for me summed up the madness of Hollywood at that time. I wouldn’t have been surprised to see a scene like on show during the silent era. Pre-Hays, it was wild. I wasn’t following the narrative of each character per se but seeing them as contributing to an overall feeling, the energy and intensiveness, the compulsion that was at the heart of Whiplash. I have to say I was quite suprised how much I enjoyed it even as I can see why it would as easy to dislike it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
When this film comes out, I’ll buy a copy; it’s got some Rolls Royce film-making to cherish. But I’m willing to make a cashless bet; Tar will recoup its costs faster than this one will…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Not a bet I’ll take. Babylon has been a flop everywhere. I doubt if Tar will break even but I’ll keep an eye on the box office. That’s the one beauty of Netflix – it’ll put a picture immediately into profit. Nobody’s going to pony up much for Babylon based on those box office figures.
LikeLiked by 2 people