The antidote to the gung-ho World War Two picture. Scarcely any action and certainly none of the French Resistance swagger of The Train (1964) or the popular uprising of Is Paris Burning? (1965). Instead, sombre realism as Resistance leader Gerbier (Lino Ventura) dodges capture in a country pitted with collaborators. Nor is the underground portrayed in heroic fashion, their methods of revenge every bit as pitiless as the occupying forces.
Told in documentary style and based on the real-life exploits of characters taking the battle to the enemy, itβs backroom stuff, Gerbier organising his Resistance cell, meeting with other leaders. But his life is fraught with tension, as he attempts to dodge capture, with little success, it has to be said.

The film opens with Gerbier in captivity, an internment camp, where he is betrayed by an informer. While being transported to Paris, he escapes. His first action, revenge. With three colleagues, in an ordinary Marseille house where use of a gun will give them away, they strangle to death an informer. Itβs not pretty.
Some join up for the risk like Jardie (Jean-Pierre Cassel), others maintain a more orderly, outwardly uninvolved, almost philosophic, lifestyle, like his older brother Luc (Paul Meurisse) who turns out to be the βBig Bossβ of the Resistance, prominent enough to be transported by submarine to London to meet French leader-in-exile De Gaulle.
Little of what they organise works out. Betrayal a constant, not just from collaborators, but from a fellow member who could be compromised by having a vulnerable child or parent. When one of the Marseille stranglers, Felix (Paul Crauchet) is captured, and likely to crack under torture, Mathilde (Simone Signoret), Gerbierβs assistant, comes up with a daring plan involving Jardie giving himself up so he will be imprisoned with Felix and, at the pessimistic end of expectations, can provide him with a cyanide pill, while the most optimistic outcome is three members disguised as Germans infiltrating the jail and sneaking him away.
The plan fails and Gerbier is subsequently arrested, imprisoned, his execution only denied by a daring rescue attempt β the only kind of typical war picture action. But then Mathilde becomes a liability and is executed.
Itβs a cold-blooded kind of film and depicts with far greater realism the endeavors β failure outweighing success of an underground operation during the Occupation. They donβt have the training for the job and their effectiveness is always open to question. Although British and American films might be filled with characters volunteering for dangerous missions, those are activities in isolation, not a commitment to a lifestyle that most likely would end in torture and death, endanger family and friends and leave you living in a sewer of suspicion. This presents an unvarnished truth. Not only are you expecting at any moment the Germans will pounce, there is a constant dread that the Resistance will be undone by their own actions, a plan too ambitious, someone cracking up, firing squad the most likely result. Thereβs nary a sniff of glory.

The big budget roadshow β The Longest Day (1962), Battle of the Bulge (1965), The Battle of Britain (1969) et al β while covering in some aspects the dangers of war were for the most part fist-pumping patriotic achievements, not this sneaking around, undercover stuff where missions were low-key, and the protagonists rarely in charge of their own destinies.
As far as French critics were concerned, the release timing was off, the film arriving in the wake of the 1968 riots and with De Gaulle in political trouble due to the Algerian situation. So it flopped with critics and audiences alike, and although it found a receptive audience in the U.K. in the late 1970s, it was denied release in the U.S. until 2006, by which point politics could not cloud opinion, and it earned rave reviews.
Lino Ventura (The Sicilian Clan, 1969) on top form is run close by Simone Signoret (The Deadly Affair, 1967). Jean-Pierre Cassell (Is Paris Burning?) comes closest to comic book heroics but even that is eventually reined in.
Everyone is helped by a screenplay by Joseph Kessel (The Night of the Generals, 1967), himself a member of the Resistance, that is light on melodrama and overwrought dialog and concentrates on getting done the job in hand, no matter how unsavory. Equally notable is the lack of grandstanding, of glorious finish, of the Hollywood convention of redemption.
Director Jean-Pierre Melville (Le Samourai, 1967) , also a Resistance fighter and with a hand in the screenplay, brings to bear film noir sensibilities and the cold-bloodedness that informed a previous oeuvre tending towards gangster pictures.
A very bold undertaking of the most dour kind that deserves appreciation.
I’m delighted you decided to include this in your 1960s pictures collection. Melville was a genius and here he has La Signoret as well as Lino Ventura. My favourite image from the film is Ventura with his glasses taped to his head with Elastoplast as he prepares to parachute back into France. RΓ©sistance films in France had a hard ride in the 1960s and it continued right up to the 1990s when a more nuanced understanding of what actually happened during the Occupation finally came to be accepted. Melville knew what he was doing.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Am a big fan of Melville. As it happens I’ve just started reading “Marianne in Chains: In Search of the German Occupation 1940-1945” by Robert Gildea published in 2002.
LikeLiked by 2 people
As said above, Melville knew his stuff, and this is a tough, mature film with the weight of history making it one for the ages. Didnβt know the writer from Generals was involved, good intel!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Fascinating to compare it to the derring-do of The Train and get a more realistic glimpse of the difficulties facing the Resistance.
LikeLike
We have to do with a huge masterpiece this time. It is Melville himself who is responsible for the screenplay, he adapts Kessel who wrote the original novel in 1943. Melville centers his script on some of the most dramatic episodes in history, in particular around the character of Mathilde interpreted by Simone Signoret. A former resistance fighter himself, Melville has also worked a lot on his legend. It’s not for nothing that after the war he kept his resistant name “Melville” (a tribute to Hermann of course) rather than Grumbach. He probably signs his greatest film there, Ventura is unforgettable, same for Simone and Meurisse.
And that’s a great review you did.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I didn’t know he had changed his name. Truly a terrific piece of work with a magnificent cast and the emphasis on the downbeat rather than the gung-ho.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very low profile kind of vision of war indeed.
I wrote on it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You did a great review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
π
LikeLike