Am getting a bit fed up with critical wishful thinking where reviewers pump up the latest effort from a “visionary” director, the movie they wish they had seen rather than the dreadful evidence of overblown miscalculation in front of their eyes. Hammy television-sized performances, fidgety faces, actors who don’t know what to do in a close-up, and a director who doesn’t know how to tell even as simplistic a tale as this without indulging in slow-mo, bizarre camera angles and sex in a storm.
Luca Guadagnino (Bones and All, 2022), in making easily the worst sports movie of all time, is an early contender for this year’s Razzies. And I’m hoping not too many people are going to fall for the marketing line that this is sizzling with sexuality when it is one of the most tepid you will ever see, beyond the kind of dialog that would have shamed Porky’s (1981).
And if you’re going to go down the Christopher Nolan flashback route, try and do it without just the title of “earlier” – if it had gotten any earlier we would have been back in the twentieth century. Any insights into tennis are restricted to the jaw-dropping revelation that there are winners and losers and not everyone’s teenage dreams can come true, and that the prom queen isn’t going to pick the sexiest lad but the one with the most financial promise.
If you’re interested, the plot goes something like this. Best pals and tennis prodigies Art (Mike Faist) and Patrick (Josh O’Connor) both fancy the same woman, Tashi (Zendaya), a cut above them in the prodigy stakes, and she thinks they actually fancy each other and engineers a scene where the two boys kiss each other. Having initially chosen the charismatic Patrick as her love mate, she changes her mind and opts for Art. A dozen or so years later – the chronology is less than exact – the rivals meet up again in a low-level tennis tournament, Art, supposedly a U.S. Open champ, Patrick a long-time loser who hasn’t made the grade.
None of the principals look as if they know one end of a tennis racquet from the other, but that doesn’t matter because the director is so busy with the dizzying visuals (including a tennis ball POV) he could have turned performing dogs into champs. Luckily for us, the moment there’s some kind of emotional climax (or attempt at one) the director hits us with some heavy music.
Josh O’Connor (Lee, 2023) has the saving grace of some screen charm but Zendaya (Dune: Part Two, 2024) blows her screen credibility with a gurning performance.
Awful.
Melissa Barrera’s character is meant to be the one we root for in Abigail, but as has been pointed out, the trailer absolutely gives the twist away, which feels like a miscalculation. We needed it to be a surprise that Abigail is a vampire, but since nobody would want to see a film about kidnapping children, they had to play that card five seconds into the trailer, meaning that it takes forever for us to get our girl team into action, the final scene in fact.
Two weeks later, I’m still washing the stench of Challengers out of my clothes, $55 million dollars not including P and A for that? Robie Collin at teh Totygraph called it ‘the most purely pleasurable film of the year’ but I’m darned if I found anything pleasurable about it. And to think Halliwell used to complain about Sidney J Furies’ ‘gimmicky’ direction by filming a scene through the dial of a phone; seeing tennis from a POV of the ball was just ridiculous. Tepid talks this up; banal would be closer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Two miscalculations. Who’s running hollywood anyway?
LikeLike
Great review. Wow I do appreciate your honesty in this review. This film has been so universally praised that I was expecting it to be an all-time classic. I’m still very much looking forward to watching this solely due to the fantastic filmmaker. Luca Guadagnino is an incredible Italian filmmaker which has proven he has abilities to make engaging movies. Many years ago, he made the captivating coming-of-age movie “Call Me By Your Name”. A gorgeous gay romance, it blew me away. So, I will definitely see his latest film because of my love for his previous work. Here’s why I adored CMBYN:
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wasn’t taken much by his previous films. All felt overhyped.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great review once again. I have to say that I disagree with you completely and that’s okay. It’s a divisive film that isn’t going to please everyone. That being said, I really connected toward its strong themes of friendships. Here’s why the movie struck a chord with me:
LikeLiked by 1 person