Ripley (2024) ***

I’m not sure I can take eight episodes of this especially in this trendy audience-alienating black-and-white version. Going all monochrome is like a bit like a novelist never deigning to describe the weather or what clothes their characters are wearing and I don’t go for the argument that the B/W is to prevent audiences being distracted by glorious Italian scenery when that’s the exact reason Dickie Greenleaf (Johnny Flynn), spoiled son of shipping mogul, went there.

I don’t know what time of year the tale was set because even the Italian seaside, warm enough presumably for Greenleaf and girlfriend Marge (Dakota Fanning) to go for a swim (Ripley remaining on the beach because his parents drowned, maybe), just looks gloomy. Anyone who can render Italy gloomy needs their head examined.

This isn’t Schindler’s List (1993) – which director Steve Zaillian wrote – that used B/W to sensible artistic effect or even Belfast (2021) where it was employed to depict the grimness of life.

I’m not even convinced by Ripley (Andrew Scott). Sure, the grifter was much more charming and personable, if occasionally awkward, as portrayed by Matt Damon (The Talented Mr Ripley, 1999) or John Malkovich (Ripley’s Game, 2002). This Ripley is just glum. Sure, his little cons don’t always work, but he can’t be as doom-struck as this.

Anyway, the story (eventually) starts when Greenleaf’s father pays Ripley, whom he believes to be a university chum of his son, to bring the errant boy, wasting his time on painting, writing and general idling, back from Italy, presumably to take on the role of inheriting the family business instead of living off his trust fund.

Like Sydney Sweeney’s character in Immaculate (2024) it hasn’t occurred to him that not everyone in Italy can speak English and so is thwarted trying to find directions to his prey’s pad. There’s a seemingly endless scene of Ripley climbing endless flights of stairs (how unfit can he be, Denzel Washington in The Equalizer 3 at least had a decent excuse) and this Ripley seems incapable of worming his way in (at least in Episode One) to his prey’s affections.

Yes, there are a couple of interesting scenes, Ripley changing seats on the subway because he sees a man staring at him on a different train. But most of the directorial art is devoted to snippets of images that have no relevance to the story or even the mood. There’s quite a barmy opening scene, too, of Ripley bumping a corpse down a flight of stairs in a tenement, not, to minimize noise,  wrapping it up in a carpet or hoisting it on his shoulders. But that is clearly a denouement and it could be an awfully dull time away.

All build-up and not much else so far.

Unknown's avatar

Author: Brian Hannan

I am a published author of books about film - over a dozen to my name, the latest being "When Women Ruled Hollywood." As the title of the blog suggests, this is a site devoted to movies of the 1960s but since I go to the movies twice a week - an old-fashioned double-bill of my own choosing - I might occasionally slip in a review of a contemporary picture.

4 thoughts on “Ripley (2024) ***”

  1. Excellent reviews as always. A shame that you didn’t really care much for this one, because it held a lot of great promise. “The Talented Mr. Ripley” is a phenomenal film that has always held a precious place in my heart. A gripping murder mystery, it was one of the first films that made me realize that Matt Damon could be a great actor. This tv show certainly looked promising based on its cast alone. While he may lack the charisma of Damon, Andrew Scott is a fantastic actor. He has proven that he can excel in a wide range of roles. I recently loved his touching performance as a queer man in “All Of Us Strangers”. Here’s why I adored that film: https://huilahimovie.reviews/2024/02/21/all-of-us-strangers-2023-movie-review/

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Give it a shot! I’m not a fan of black and white, and I’d probably have preferred this in colour. But it’s certainly different from other versions of Ripley. I dodn’t think Highsmith mean this character to be a con-man James Bond, but a portrait of a weak and slimy man, and I think that’s where we’re going with this. For once, dragging things out is the point, I think we see Ripley’s awkwardness in a way we never did before.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You make some interesting points. I’ll try another couple of episodes but to be honest the B/W will probably defeat you. Highsmith loved con artists and bad guys so I doubt if she intended him to come across as weak.

      Like

Leave a comment

Discover WordPress

A daily selection of the best content published on WordPress, collected for you by humans who love to read.

The Atavist Magazine

by Brian Hannan

WordPress.com News

The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.