Few stars were as willing to trade their glamorous screen persona for a decent role as Elizabeth Taylor, here eschewing the trademark hip swivel, low cut dresses and elegant costumes for a clumping walk, frumpy look and eating with her mouth full. After a chance meeting on top of a bus with rich waif Cenci (Mia Farrow) middle-aged prostitute Leonora (Elizabeth Taylor) swaps a dingy bedsit for life in a massive mansion, cupboards stuffed full of furs, all her needs met. Cenci seeks a mother; Leonora, whose daughter drowned aged ten, seeks a child substitute.
Soon Leonora is prisoner to a fantasist, her own identity swamped by Cenci’s needs, accepting the role of “mummy” as the price of a life of luxury until she learns that what appears so freely given can be as easily taken away. This cloistered life is creepy. Cenci has rape fantasies. To a pair of interfering and thieving aunts, Leonora pretends to be Cenci’s dead mother’s cousin.

The fantasy conjured is threatened by the presence of Cenci’s poet stepfather Albert (Robert Mitchum) who intends to become the girl’s legal guardian. He talks like a child molester, “the extraordinary purity of my longings,” but given the depth of Cenci’s fantasies Leonora initially discounts inappropriate behavior on his part especially when Cenci wishes to become inappropriate with her. If Leonora stands in Albert’s way it is only to have the girl – and her wealth – to herself.
A psychological drama that appears more like a stage play in structure, skirting around core issues in favor of later revelation, and in essence making a good effort at dealing with behavioral problems which would find greater currency today – inherited mental illness, PTSD, low self-esteem, abuse, and incest. Though the last area is hard to specify, on the basis that, technically, Albert is a stepfather rather than a father, underage sex would appear to be more likely.
In an era when permissiveness virtually ensured audience shock, director Joseph Losey makes a decent stab at presenting the impact of sex on the vulnerable, despite her apparent steely exterior Leonora damaged by life as a sex worker, Cenci pretending to be younger as if that can sustain her innocence, not realizing how appealing that would be to a predator.

At once hypnotic and impenetrable, this is director Joseph Losey (The Servant, 1964) at his best, a story that by its subject matter must remain obscure, a mother-daughter relationship that should be twisted but reveals nothing but tenderness, ending for a time the torment of the emotionally unfulfilled, but when bonds appear to be strengthened they are fragmenting. However, the film is let down by the script and the somewhat grand guignol setting. Losey is wonderful at times with nothing to say just a prowling camera, only two lines of dialogue exchanged in the first 15 minutes. You would certainly file it under “eclectic.”
The two main performances are electric. This is Taylor at her powerhouse best, her profession not glamorized as in Butterfield 8 (1968) and no male to bring to heel, and her last scene with Cenci is extremely touching. This was a bold role, too, for Mia Farrow after the success of Rosemary’s Baby (1967) turned her into a box office star. She brings believability to a difficult role, especially as she is far from the spoiled child one might expect.
Robert Mitchum fans must have received the fright of their life to see their hero not just with uncomely beard but portraying a sinister character, not an out-and-out villain which would have been acceptable, but fast forward a couple of years and you can see evidence here of the kind of portrayal he would evince in Ryan’s Daughter (1970). Look out for Peggy Ashcroft (The Nun’s Story, 1959) in a smaller role, her first film in nearly a decade.
Now I have seen this one, but a little too grand guignol for my taste. It’s a slippery slope, but you’ll be reviewing 1973’s Night Watch before you know it…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Taylor was excellent but almost house of horror without the excess.
LikeLike
I didn’t like this one, but generally I am not too fond of Losey’s movies where his marxist views infuse the story. My favorite Losey remains by far Mr. Klein, which is fantastic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not too much Marxism involved here. Farrow shares her wealth with Taylor but she does want a lot in return. Figueres in a Landscape is one of my favourites and I’ll be duty-bound to return to Boom which I saw as a teenager at the Cosmo (The GFT as it is now), a sure sign their box office was waning if it only appeared at an arthouse.
LikeLike
Even if it is not as obvious as in The Servant and his other films written by Pinter, I do think that the vision of the society in display here derives from Losey’s Marxist beliefs. If you’re interested and read French, here is my review of the film where I mention this. https://newstrum.com/2016/11/08/ceremonie-secrete-de-joseph-losey-dans-la-maison/
LikeLike
I was taking Marxism is its narrow sense rather than the angle you take in your review – the place of each person in society. I see your point. I hadn’t quite gone for the master/servant element because Taylor soon realizes she does have power and she relates in a very interesting manner to Mitchum. Great review. I don’t read French but Mr Google translated.
LikeLike
Thanks ! And I understand the angle you’re coming coming from.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh man, this movie was hilariously bad, in that way where everyone is terribly earnest and they seem to have no idea how awful it is. Still, I had fun watching it.
LikeLike
Reading a Maigret quartet .
LikeLike
One of the great things about Maigret is you can read them right after the other and you don’t get tired of them. Helps that they’re so quick!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly. I’m reading Maigret’s Failure. the others in the compendium are Maigret’s Special Murder, Maigret in Society and Maigret and the Lazy Burglar.
LikeLike
I thought Losey was earnest and perhaps Farrow but Taylor had been directed by better directors than him and I had the impression she was doing her own thing. Mitchum would not have been particularly impressed by arthouse and apparently was extremely unpleasant to Losey although they had been friends in the past.
LikeLike